1
15
1
-
https://d1y502jg6fpugt.cloudfront.net/17269/archive/files/3f232c4add381a9f33f114df38ed6e45.pdf?Expires=1712793600&Signature=b%7EnlmMVIMJSVQma2nsly9Dhqvm8XDWGzrYeZ-EHimN8me3HsTDVoAp5CscOtkYP4S6CJHyR3stQn2BkLDE6bJB-N9FRezuVKtyS8P0BvjoOJm1cmcTTNNQU6ERTvwmXySjscYykrlRaTDSdPJxrbx2bk23-pDkbqaL7%7E9h33Rz7PoXBpZXTA2LRrCZEB5Zxd%7ELSDI7RnmJKemd512oHJc3%7Eno6Worsrl--6CrjKNHCx7DwnPkeWfvV39WUBq0zkvdKI-6V-C8Rd-EKi5aqC7V2IOILOv9sn98mYZycGbalVKuJT78dA05p-y5Ljvd3RpNUfCNhtUqqrg6AMpmdBmzg__&Key-Pair-Id=K6UGZS9ZTDSZM
e77d7b6b8d7cbc346e68ea0638c44a1b
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Senior Showcase 2016
Description
An account of the resource
Oral and poster presentations from Senior Showcase held on April 19, 2016 at Ripon College.
Publisher
An entity responsible for making the resource available
Ripon College Lane Library
Date
A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource
April 2016
Contributor
An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource
Ripon College Seniors 2016
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
What’s Mine is Mine, Because it’s Better if it’s Mine: A Defense of a Utilitarian Incentives-Based Account of Intellectual Property Rights by Jeffrey Grinde
Subject
The topic of the resource
Philosophy
Creator
An entity primarily responsible for making the resource
Grinde, Jeffrey
Source
A related resource from which the described resource is derived
Ripon College Oral presentation
Publisher
An entity responsible for making the resource available
Ripon College
Date
A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource
April 19, 2016
Rights
Information about rights held in and over the resource
The author reserves all rights.
Identifier
An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context
Majors: Philosophy, Chemistry-Biology
Ripon, WI
Philosophy 491 - Senior Seminar
Description
An account of the resource
Intellectual property (IP) rights have been codified into law ever since we have thought about intellectual property. What we want is a theory that grounds our right to intellectual property. Upon examination of historical precedents of thinking about IP rights, it becomes clear that to say we have a right to IP, what we really mean is that we have three sub-rights to IP. These three sub-rights are the right to own IP, the right to profit from one's IP, and the right to be recognized for one's own IP. There are three competing theories that ground these three sub-rights: the personality-based theory, the Lockean theory, and the rule/incentives-based theory. My argument is that whichever of the three theories best grounds the three sub-rights to IP is the theory that we ought to accept. Of the three theories, the rule/incentives-based theory best grounds the three IP right; hence, we ought to accept the rule/incentives-based theory as the justificatory account of IP rights. The following paper is a defense of the argument.
Format
The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource
pdf
Hegel
Intellectual Property Rights
Locke
Philosophy
Utilitarianism